ホーム / Consumer Verification Guides / New ingredients: status and labeling

Urolithin A, Spermidine, Ergothioneine, PQQ: Are These New Ingredients Legitimate? A 2026 Guide to Regulatory Status and Labeling

日本語 / 中文

JRQ consumer verification guide Published: November 6, 2026

This guide covers information verification methods only. It does not evaluate the efficacy or safety of any ingredient or treatment, does not recommend or rank any specific product or medical provider, and is not a certification of any kind.

People ask: which anti-aging supplement is better? When they see names like urolithin A, spermidine, ergothioneine, and PQQ, they do not know which to choose. JRQ does not list brands and does not judge whether these ingredients are "legitimate." This guide covers one thing: how to check documents, read labels, and verify for yourself. Start with what the ingredient is where it is sold, then check whether the labeling is specific, and finally check whether the cited studies can be traced.

First check the ingredient's status where it is sold

If you buy in mainland China, first check whether the ingredient has appeared in a new food ingredient announcement or is listed in the health food raw material catalog. Both can be checked on official channels of China's National Health Commission (NHC) and the State Administration for Market Regulation. JRQ will not check the conclusion for you. It only reminds you: not finding a record does not necessarily mean there is a problem. Finding a record still means you should keep checking the label.

For products sold in mainland China, if the product has the "blue hat" health food logo, check the registration number, filing number, and health function on the special food information inquiry platform. If it does not have the blue hat, it is an ordinary food and cannot make health function claims. You can check these yourself; you do not need to rely on what the seller says.

When buying in Japan, look at the ingredient lists published by the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare (MHLW). One is "the MHLW list of ingredients used exclusively as pharmaceuticals." The other is the list of ingredients that are not judged as pharmaceuticals as long as no drug-like efficacy is claimed. Which list an ingredient appears in is the starting point for checking its status. You should also check this starting point yourself, rather than relying only on what a personal shopper or seller says.

One reminder: Japan has no legal category called "health food." What the market calls health food is legally just food. Foods with Function Claims (FFC) use a notification system (a notification is not an approval), and Foods for Specified Health Uses (FOSHU) are individually approved. Both can be checked on the Consumer Affairs Agency (CAA) website. If there is no record, treat the product as an ordinary food, and ordinary food does not make efficacy claims.

Then check the label: name, source, and milligrams per daily serving need to be specific

When you see a new ingredient name, first check whether the label gives a specific chemical name. For example, it should say "urolithin A" or "L-ergothioneine," not made-up terms such as "cellular energy factor" or "plant anti-aging factor." The raw material source also needs to be stated: whether it is plant extract, fermentation, or synthesis. Just saying "natural source" is not enough.

For content, look at the number of milligrams per daily serving, not per capsule, per tablet, or per bottle. If the label only says "compound plant extract" without naming the specific ingredients and their amounts, that information is incomplete.

The test report also needs to match. Is the sample in the report a raw material or a finished product? Is the test method stated? Is the substance tested the same one named on the label? If the report and the label do not match, the report cannot be used to vouch for the label.

"New ingredient" and "black tech" do not equal evidence

A new ingredient is only new. That does not mean it has more evidence. When a product page cites research, first check it using the JRQ-D-006 approach: Can the paper be traced back to the original source? Is the study subject a raw material or this product? Is it an in vitro, animal, or human study? If it is a human study, is it a randomized controlled trial (RCT) or an observational study? A preprint has not undergone peer review, so look carefully. Conflicts of interest and funding sources should also be visible. Formal clinical trial registrations can also be checked, such as jRCT and UMIN-CTR in Japan, ChiCTR in China, and ClinicalTrials.gov in the United States.

JRQ does not evaluate the conclusions of any study. It only reminds you: a cited paper does not mean the product is effective. If a page only says "research confirmed" or "scientific breakthrough" without giving a source, or if the source cannot be opened, that citation cannot be verified.

Check combination products using the JRQ-D-018 approach

Many products put several new ingredients together in one product. First check whether the amount per daily serving is written for each ingredient, not just a "total content of the combined formula."

Using the JRQ-D-018 approach, for combination products also check: Do the ingredients listed on the label match the actual raw materials? How is the total amount added up? Which ingredients does the test report cover? If there is only one report that tested PQQ and it is used to prove the whole combination product, the evidence does not match.

Verification checklist

Item to checkWhere to lookWhat adequate information looks likeWarning signs
Ingredient identity (mainland China)NHC new food ingredient announcements, State Administration for Market Regulation special food information inquiry platformThe corresponding announcement or a "blue hat" approval certificate can be foundOnly says "imported" or "American ingredient" without giving a domestic raw material basis
Ingredient identity (Japan)MHLW ingredient lists, Consumer Affairs Agency Foods with Function Claims searchYou can check which list the ingredient is on or see the notification information yourselfOnly says "popular in Japan" or "Japanese formula" without giving a checkable entry point
Specific chemical nameProduct label, product pageStates the chemical name or internationally common name clearly, without abbreviations or invented termsOnly uses invented names such as "anti-aging factor" or "black-tech ingredient"
SourceLabel or manufacturer's informationStates the specific source, such as plant extract, fermentation, or synthesisOnly says "natural source" without naming the plant or process
Amount per daily servingNutrition facts panel on the label or product pageStates milligrams per daily serving for a specific ingredientOnly states content per capsule or per bottle
Test reportTest report provided by the sellerStates the test method, whether the sample is a raw material or finished product, and batch numberReport does not match the labeled ingredient, has no batch number, or only tests the raw material
Research citationsPapers cited on the product pageCan be traced to the original source, and states study type and subjectOnly says "research confirmed" or "scientific breakthrough" without a source, or the source cannot be opened
Combination formula labelingIngredient list on the labelEach ingredient states milligrams per daily serving, and the total adds upOnly states "total content of the combined formula" without breaking it down
Certification marksThird-party certification markThe certification body, certified subject, and validity period can be checkedSelf-invented mark, or the certification covers the factory but the product is implied to have passed

Common misconceptions

  • Misconception: A "new ingredient" means high technology and better effects. Reality: "New" only means the ingredient has been on the market for a short time and has less public information. It does not mean it has stronger evidence.
  • Misconception: A product sold in Japan has been approved by the Japanese government. Reality: Ordinary health food in Japan is legally just food. Foods with Function Claims use a notification system (a notification is not an approval), and only Foods for Specified Health Uses are individually approved.
  • Misconception: If the page lists research citations, the product is effective. Reality: Citations first need to be checked for whether they can be traced, whether the study subject matches the product, and what type of study it is.
  • Misconception: Having the blue hat means the product is right for you. Reality: The blue hat only means this is a health food, and the approved function is written on the certificate. It does not mean it is suitable for everyone.

Related JRQ standards

Scope of this guide

This guide only explains how to verify information. It does not evaluate the efficacy of any ingredient, does not judge whether ingredients such as urolithin A, spermidine, ergothioneine, and PQQ are "legitimate" or not, and does not recommend or certify any specific product. If you are taking medication, have a chronic disease, or are pregnant or breastfeeding, consult a doctor or pharmacist before buying.

Other guides: Reading "research shows" claims · Checking safety information · Checking label dosage information · Ingredient identity and isomers · Checking comparison claims · Checking combination formulas · Checking certification claims · Checking overseas raw material claims · Checking regenerative medicine providers in Japan · Checking "stem cell" products · Storage and stability · Reading "not detected" · Lot numbers and authenticity · Production methods and impurities · Checking glutathione labels · Checking 5-ALA labels · Reading advertising terms · Questions to ask sellers · Checking cell storage services · Checking PQQ labels · Phosphatidylserine labels · Alpha-lipoic acid labels · Checking ergothioneine labels · Checking plasmalogen labels · Checking quercetin labels · Checking creatine labels · Checking sesamin labels · Berberine labeling and status